In the last decade, the new computing concept has become a fundamental pillar for companies of all sizes. This model allows data to be stored and processed over the Internet, instead of relying on local physical servers. However, despite the advantages offered by new users, the use of traditional servers is still a common practice in many organizations. To better understand these technologies, it is crucial to define each of these terms. Computing in our country refers to the delivery of computing services via Internet connections, including hardware, processing and software. On the other hand, a traditional server is a physical machine dedicated to the management of resources and services within a local network. The main differences between cloud computing and traditional servers are presented below: Feature: Cloud computing; Traditional Servers; Initial Costs. Mensais paymentsHigh hardware acquisition costsScalabilityHigh; Resources on demandLimited; Require the purchase of additional hardwareManutençãoManutenção provided by the supplierResponsibilidade total do userAcessibilidadeAccess from any place on the internetLimited network access internal

As it can be seen, the computation in Although we now offer significant benefits in terms of cost and accessibility, there are some arguments that perceived security is lower compared to traditional servers. This concern is valid, since arming sensitive data at no time always carries the risk of violations. However, many new service providers offer advanced security measures that can overcome traditional solutions. With our new traditional servers, it is important to analyze the main service providers currently available: Amazon Web Services (AWS), Microsoft Azure and Google Cloud Platform (GCP). Each has unique features that can make them most suitable depending on the type of project or business.

Provider VantagensDesvantagens
AWSWide range of services and global solutions. Highly scalable. It may be complicated for new users due to its complexity. Azure. Perfect integration with Microsoft products. Ideal for companies already familiar with their ecosystem. Costs can increase quickly if not properly controlled. Google Cloud. Excellence in analysis and machine learning. It offers competitive prices.A lesser use in comparison with AWS and Azure may result in fewer available resources.

Despite the aforementioned differences, there are certain areas in which these providers are This increases significantly. For example, they all offer free trial periods that allow users to experiment for years before making a financial commitment. Also, rapid scalability is a strong point in common. Isso facilitates the adaptation of moves to business needs without investing in additional infrastructure. However, various doubts arise among interested parties when choosing a supplier. Is it really necessary to use some of these services if a company has sufficient technological resources to operate with traditional servers? The answer depends on the specific context of each organization. While local servers can offer greater control over the infrastructure, they also require high operational costs, which could be advantageous for many companies.